Machine learning vs actuarial methods in claim prediction

Machine learning vs actuarial methods in claim prediction


Thanks! Share it with your friends!


You disliked this video. Thanks for the feedback!

Sorry, only registred users can create playlists.


Speaker: Friedrich Loser

Several claim prediction competitions on "Your Home of Data Science" were dominated and finally won by applying non-parametric machine learning methods, e.g. random forest and gradient tree boosting, instead of using parametric actuarial methods. So, is this a threat for actuaries? Should non-life actuaries switch to machine learning techniques?

In this presentation, the insurance data, the machine learning methods and the winning solutions for three claim prediction competitions on are briefly described:

  1. Allstate claims prediction challenge 2011: Predict bodily injury liability insurance claim payments based on the characteristics of the insured's vehicle
  2. Liberty Mutual Kaggle Competition 2014: Predict expected fire losses for insurance policies
  3. Allstate Claims Severity 2016: How severe is an insurance claim?

To complete the picture, the most popular tools (Python, R and fast algorithms like XGBoost) and some "kaggler" are sketched.

The winning teams used complex stacked model ensembles to avoid overfitting and to minimize variance. Despite that, we will focus on the best single machine learning models and compare them to parametric actuarial methods. The performance of the new, as well as traditional best models, will be evaluated and compared to the often inapplicable complex winning solutions by using post competition submissions.
Finally, results and leader boards of machine learning and actuarial methods in claim prediction are presented and the advantages of both approaches assessed.

Post your comment

Sign in or sign up to post comments.
Be the first to comment