Categories
- ACTUARIAL DATA SCIENCE
- AFIR / ERM / RISK
- ASTIN / NON-LIFE
- BANKING / FINANCE
- DIVERSITY & INCLUSION
- EDUCATION
- HEALTH
- IACA / CONSULTING
- LIFE
- PENSIONS
- PROFESSIONALISM
- Thought Leadership
- MISC
Voting paradoxes for pension funds
uploaded June 16, 2021
Views: 740
Comments: 3
Favorite: 0
CPD
Speakers:
Description:
Pension fund trustees are increasingly aware of decision-making biases, which is critical to robust pension fund risk management. However, decision-makers also need to establish robust voting procedures to ensure group decisions reflect the underlying individual preferences. I present three case studies where pension fund decisions can go wrong due to inadequate voting methods, examine the underlying causes, and outline best practices for arriving at group decisions.
Categories:
PENSIONS
Content groups:
content2021
3 Comments
1037 Days ago
Dear SmitIACA, have you turned on the sound? In the video player and on your computer?
1038 Days ago
Thank you, Matthew. Your presentation has applications and use beyond rhe group decision-making of pension fund trustees. It feels to me that resolution of "no clear winner" examples can be a challenge for all of us.
1038 Days ago
perhaps the problem is with me, i see the slides but do not hear the swpeaker